You may not have heard the explosion, but it happened.
A review from The Cochrane
Collaboration, a widely respected research-analysis team, went over all
the evidence, and entered its conclusion:
In healthy adults, no flu vaccine delivers protection from the flu.
Boom!
It doesn’t protect against transmission of flu viruses from person to person, either.
Boom!
So all the promotion and all the
pandering and all the scare tactics and all the “expert medical opinion”
and all the media coverage…useless, worthless, and irrelevant.
Billions of dollars of financed lies about flu vaccines were just that: lies.
It gets worse, because the entire
theory about how and why vaccines work is sitting on a razor’s edge,
ready to fall into the abyss of discarded fairy tales.
We’ve been told that vaccines
stimulate the immune system with a “rehearsal” of what will happen when
an actual disease comes down the pipeline. When the disease does show
up, the immune system will be locked and loaded, ready to destroy the
attacking germ.
But since flu vaccines don’t protect
against flu or even stop the transmission of flu viruses from person to
person, the so-called “rehearsing” of the immune system is merely
somebody’s fancy story. A legend. A myth.
Also, you can forget about the widely
sold herd-immunity tale. How can the group be immune when vaccines are
doing nothing to prevent the free movement of germs from person to
person?
As always, The Cochrane Collaboration
did an exhaustive review of all previous studies on flu vaccines they
could discover. They rejected the studies that were badly constructed.
In some cases, to expand available data, they contacted individual
researchers who had conducted studies.
Therefore, Cochrane’s findings
represent the best of the published literature on flu vaccines. However,
because the Cochrane team owes nothing to pharmaceutical companies,
they analyzed the literature with sober eyes and minds.
Here is an interesting comment from
the analysis: “The review showed that reliable evidence on influenza
vaccines is thin but there is evidence of widespread manipulation of
conclusions…”
Now who in the world would benefit from such manipulating?
Oh yes. One other thing.
The Cochrane review, published by John Wiley and Sons, appeared online on July 7, 2010.
Over two years ago.
We must have missed the massive
mainstream media coverage. Perhaps we were fishing that day, or buying
tires for the car, or vacationing on our yachts in the Mediterranean.
What? There was no massive media coverage? Impossible. I mean, surely…
No comments:
Post a Comment